I had the opportunity to attend the first half of Mark Lewis' keynote on Tuesday
morning. Mark is the Senior Vice President of EMC's Content
Management & Archive unit. I found
his opening theme to be interesting, though the messaging did not convey the
true power of the metaphor he used.
The metaphor
Mark employed pertained to money, value and intelligence. His description of money and value began with
great promise. Money, or a discussion thereof,
invariably grabs listeners’ attention.
Such was the state of keynote attendees, sitting poised to here of a
very powerful comparison that could and would speak them as well as to any stakeholder
in the IT purchasing chain who may not be so “close” to the technology.
The metaphor
was built on the fact that money is “dumb.”
As a thing, it has no intrinsic value.
Money only derives value in context.
Mark then compared information to money, and twisted the metaphor by
stating that information must become intelligent. It maybe a semantic difference, but I think
Mark would have delivered a more powerful message by declaring the need – nay,
necessity – for “dumb” data.
In service
of brevity, let me state that the reason money is powerful is because it is
absolutely fungible. Money only derives value in context. Money has no
absolute value as evidenced by Foreign Exchange fluctuations and notions
of price. As I said, and Mark began by stating, money is necessarily and beneficially “dumb”.
Data too is
dumb. Data (or “content” if they can be used as synonyms) only becomes
intelligent when the context ascribes value to "data" that's employed
for a purpose. Even at rest, data may have value, but "rest" is
merely one characteristic of that specific data instance's context.
The message
conveyed in the Keynote was that content is becoming intelligent. The
truth is that the context is becoming intelligent and data must get
"dumber." In fact, I'd argue that the success of De-Duplication
technology is a result of end-user's realizing that data is dumb and that eliminating
dumb redundancies is a relatively easy and necessary process.
Under this
slightly modified scheme, dumb information becomes, like money, absolutely
fungible and therefore far more powerful. The "value context,"
one of a million or billion individuated states of experience, becomes the
point where value and intelligence are added to data much like a merger &
acquisition is a specific "value context" and money, dumb money,
becomes the medium to exchange value between parties - even across distinct
currencies.
Comments