This being an introduction, it might be most appropriate to
provide biographical information, lists of interests or some other information
providing you the reader with insight into who I am and why its worth reading
further. However blogs were meant to capture those qualities that the author is who his or her readership
believes him/her to be. If this
is the case, which I think it very likely it is, I'll offer only a thumbnail
sketch of the pertinent details. The
blog itself will take on a character - my character - as an expression of my
contributions and our exchanges.
It may be foolhardy to enter the blogosphere with such a
heady initial subject. But before I jump
off and expound, allow me to provide some context of the autobiographical sort. I am and have been an analyst, an industry
analyst. For much of the past six years
I've had the pleasure of plying my craft with various firms. When I first became an analyst actually did
not know what an analyst was. I knew
what the dictionary said. However I had
been in the field installing, integrating and babysitting hardware and software
solutions and the people who use them. At the periphery of this world lived the industry analyst. On occasion the analyst would find her way
into our world -- but only in spirit never in body. Analysts were people that our customers
referred to - much like an auto mechanic presented with a “Road & Track”
article by a nervous or nervously enthusiastic owner. This person provided comfort to the consumer
but not always wisdom or insight. This
is what I knew – and what I know – because this condition is not limited to the
past or past tense.
At this point an image is probably taking shape in your
mind. The introduction so far been well
short of a thousand words is I suspect leaving you with a rather spartan picture. And this is where it ties back to
my mention of the virtualized person. For you who don't know me (and even if you do) the picture your mind is
painting and the context your mind is establishing relies on the specific colors from
the limited palette I have provided thus far. Its is an abstract, or is an art historian may say a detail. At the risk of being too academic or for that
matter technical how does one distinguish between the abstract or the
virtualized and the real.